Obama And Hillary
Clinton Tried To Use The Federal Election Commission To
Silence And Punish The Conservative Media In America While
Engaging In Censorship Using Google
June 30. 2016
Barack Obama
I am not a fan of Fox
News. I don't watch it anymore. I haven't since it became so
divisive years ago. However, I am a fan of free speech and
free press. It is a right in the western world. Therefore,
it is illegal and hypocritical that the Obama Administration
used the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in an attempt to
censor and punish Fox News for promoting a republican
candidate on their network. Never mind democrats are
constantly promoted on many networks that bash republicans.
When you think about the
fact the emails of democrat, Hillary Clinton, which have
been made public as apart of a criminal investigation into
the presidential candidate's illegal activities, reveal she
"has the media on a leash" it is highly hypocritical for her
allies in the Obama Administration, which she once belonged
to as Secretary of State, to criticize a news outlet for
promoting a rival republican.
For years the majority
of the media in America has been controlled by democrats.
The media in America, much like Hollywood, has a very
noticeable liberal slant (pro-democrat) and constantly
publishes items that bash, degrade, mock, insult and
ridicule conservatives (anti-republican). This imbalance
gave rise to Fox News and the influential website the Drudge
Report (I do read Drudge Report). Both outlets became hugely
successful in America, as they cater to millions of
underserved conservatives.
Some democrats in
Congress and other branches of the U.S. government have
deliberately and repeatedly violated the U.S. Constitution
and U.S. Code, in trying to censor, abuse and shutdown Fox
News, Drudge Report and similar conservative outlets, for
having a contrasting point of view.
Hillary Clinton
Lawbreaking liberals in
the U.S. government and Hollywood have gone to extraordinary
and disturbing lengths to silence conservatives, even
jeopardizing the name and financial existence of
multi-billion dollar internet service providers, hosting
companies, software manufacturers, Pay Pal, Google and
advertisers, contacting said companies demanding they damage
the financial interests/income and free speech/free press
rights of conservatives.
Deranged requests from
the aforementioned liberals include demanding the companies
in question unconstitutionally cancel the internet hosting
accounts (Google), paid advertising (Google), financial
sales handled through Paypal, public donations processed by
PayPal, of conservative websites in order to unlawfully
remove them from the internet and destroy their ability to
make money to support themselves.
High profile liberals
have also been sending deranged requests to Google to
manipulate their system, resulting in the company putting
out deceptive search results that grossly defame others and
their family members, while redirecting and suppressing
traffic from conservative websites.
All in insane efforts to
censor, silence and punish conservatives. Not to mention,
Google is currently embroiled in a scandal regarding
changing search results in favor of Hillary Clinton, hiding
negative articles that expose criminal conduct she is under
formal investigation for at the FBI. Google has also been
weeding out all articles critical of Hillary Clinton, as one
of her top donors is the CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt. He has
compromised Google and brought very unflattering mainstream
publicity on the company, in conduct sure to upset
shareholders.
Google and Facebook have
also been suppressing conservative news and opinion pieces
from search results on Google.com and Facebook.com. The
predictive text Google uses on its site has been programmed
with parameters to never help search users finish the
website address or names of thousands of known conservative
sites, politicians, authors, speakers, activities,
entertainers, athletes and celebrities. You could type "Hi"
and not finish the word "Hillary" and it will immediately
suggest and give you the link for Hillary Clinton's website.
How does Google know
I'm not trying to look up the word "hick" or "high" or
"hierarchy"
Under the influence of
the Obama Administration, Google's search results have
become biased and censored, representing poor journalism
standards (it didn't use to be like that). Now Google is
actively removing critical items in favor of glowing pieces
on people like Clinton, among others. When Hillary has her
office contact Google to complain that she wants an
unflattering exposé article removed from Google's search
results on Google.com and Google News, it is gone within
minutes. Journalists have seen it happen. However, let a
mother contact Google complaining there is illegal child
porn of her victimized child in Google Images or Google.com
and they will leave that garbage up there for weeks,
sometimes months. There are court cases where Google has
left child porn online for unreasonably long periods of
time, after formal requests were made to remove the illegal
items.
The Washington Times
reported:
"For example, when
typing 'Hillary Clinton cri,' Google’s auto-complete
function brings up as its top choice 'Hillary Clinton crime
reform,' even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo
show the most popular search topics are 'Hillary Clinton
criminal charges' and 'Hillary Clinton crime.' While that
could reflect legitimate differences in the engines’
algorithms, Mr. Lieberman said that a search of 'Hillary
Clinton crime reform' on Google trends showed that 'there
weren’t even enough searches of term to build a graph on the
site.'
'Which begs the
question, why on Earth is it the first potential result?' he
said, adding, 'Apparently far more people are searching for
‘Hillary Clinton crimes’ than ‘Hillary Clinton crime
reform.’ Google just doesn’t want you to know or ask.'
SourceFed found a similar result when typing in, 'Hillary
Clinton ind,' which yielded 'Hillary Clinton Indiana' and
'Hillary Clinton India' on Google, but 'Hillary Clinton
indictment' on the other search engines.
'The intention is
clear. Google is burying potential searches for terms that
could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections
over the past several months by manipulating recommendations
on their site,' Mr. Lieberman said. There was no difference
between Google and other search engines when SourceFed
searched for unflattering terms associated with Democrat
Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump...'
The unhinged liberal
censorship drive by select people in the U.S. government and
Hollywood, has damaged the name and finances of American
corporations like Google and Paypal, among others, who are
financially worth more than the lawbreaking liberals in
government and Hollywood combined, imperiled jobs and
taxable revenue, under public backlash. However, as long as
they can illegally and insanely censor and shut people up,
that's all that matters, America's financial interests be
damned (sarcasm). I find it distasteful and disgusting. It's
very ugly and unbecoming.
Lawbreaking liberals in
the U.S. government and Hollywood need to stop trying to
shut people up who disagree with them. It looks certifiably
insane. It looks like you have screws loose. It is uncivil
and uncouth to think you have a right to tell others they
can't express themselves, because it doesn't agree with your
point of view and agenda. They are behaving like bratty
children with no understanding of the law or people's right
to have an opinion. Grow up already.
There are people's
opinions I do not agree with. However, I don't act like a
blazing lunatic trying to sabotage their income, terrorize
their families, friends and supporters, criminally spy on
them in insidious ways and or use the law in illegal bids at
trying to silence them in violation of the Constitution and
United Nation's laws on freedom of expression, as some in
government and Hollywood have done to conservatives in
America.
I simply listen to,
watch and read the things I have an interest in and let
other people I disagree with be. It's called being an adult
in realizing not everyone will have the same opinion and
that is called democracy. Lawbreaking liberals in government
and those in Hollywood attacking conservatives in criminal
ways should try it sometime. YES, DEMOCRACY.
Considering their ages,
most of them are in their 50s-70s, it's a childhood lesson
regarding getting along with others that they should have
already learned from their parents in their formative years.
It is not a good look to be in your 50-70s and acting like
spoiled, ill-manner children, who want their own way all the
time or they'll throw their toys out of the pram. When
you're five you can get away with throwing a temper tantrum.
When you're in your
50s-70s throwing temper tantrums, spying on people,
terrorizing them and their families, emailing and calling
all over the place trying to silence and punish others for
expressing a lawful opinion, you look like maniacs...not
people who should be in positions of power. It denotes
mental illness to go that far trying to destroy others over
their lawful opinions.
You need to look in the
mirror, because this is what you have come to in the public
eye. This is why so many Americans voice the view on social
networking, in many website feedback sections and message
boards/forums that the American media is owned and being
controlled by a handful of people. You call people with said
view conspiracy theorists, but when you do the basic
research you realize only a handful of people own the media
and entertainment companies in America. And God help you if
you decide to start a media outlet or entertainment company
in America, as the small handful of people who do own most
of the networks and newspapers will literally try to have
you killed for it. So much for a free and open market and
fair trade, huh.
America is roughly half
democrat and half republican. Elections usually fall along
those lines with a small percent of votes swinging the
direction in either direction. It's usually a democrat for
one or two terms, then a republican for one or two terms.
Considering America is roughly half conservative, in
essence, lawbreaking liberals in the U.S. government and
Hollywood have been attacking and savaging the views and
rights of half the country, which is a vile thing to do.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Everyone is entitled to
be heard. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs and values.
Donald Trump
Due to Obama's Nixonian
obsession with the press, this harmful madness has been
transpiring against innocent people (Richard Nixon, is a
former president who famously tried to poison a law-abiding,
outspoken journalist via a failed plot to spray poison on
the writer's steering wheel, took his press clippings far to
seriously as well).
The Judiciary Report has
repeatedly warned that the Obama Administration, on the
president's orders, has been abusing journalists in America,
having the FBI and CIA spy on, threaten, harass, bully and
financially damage journalists and bloggers (and their
family members). Obama's unconscionable behavior in this
regard, has criminally extended into Britain, as he has been
illegally sending the FBI and CIA to target journalists at
the Guardian newspaper, in a nation he has absolutely no
legal mandate to operate in. His behavior is arrogant,
mean-spirited, shameful and ugly.
Obama's bumptiousness
and imperialism was revealed again recently, as he went into
Britain threatening the British people to vote to remain in
the European Union or he would financially abuse the United
Kingdom. That was a gross and disgusting abuse of authority
by Obama, regarding a nation that has put billions of
dollars in Americans pockets via tourism and trade (and vice
versa).
Political leaders in
Britain and the EU are incensed with Obama over Brexit, as
polls showed his visit to London in April, where with his
nose in the air and head flung back like a diva, issued
threats against the British people (clearly believing his
own hype) which immediately resulted in a big bounce for the
"leave the European Union" campaign. There are politicians
in Britain and the European Union who want Obama's head on a
platter over it.
Ironically, Obama's
suppression of conservatives in America, gave rise to Donald
Trump. The Obama administration went so far to the political
left, getting very abusive with the conservative segment of
the American population, that the pendulum has swung all the
way to the political right with such viscosity, it caught
the whole world's attention = Donald Trump.
STORY SOURCE
Fox targeted by FEC Dems in first-ever vote to punish
debate sponsorship
6/29/16 2:52 PM - Finally making good on
long-harbored anger at conservative media, Democrats on the
Federal Election Commission voted in secret to punish Fox
News' sponsorship of a Republican presidential debate, using
an obscure law to charge the network with helping those on
stage. It is the first time in history that members of the
FEC voted to punish a media outlet's debate sponsorship, and
it follows several years of Democratic threats against
conservative media and websites like the Drudge Report.
The punishment, however, was blocked by all
three Republicans on the commission, resulting in a 3-3 tie
vote and no action. A Republican FEC commissioner leading
that fight, Lee E. Goodman, revealed the vote to Secrets
Wednesday and said the official report of the May 26
executive vote will be released Thursday. Goodman has led
the fight against several other efforts to censor
conservative media by Democrats on the FEC.
"The government should not punish any
newsroom's editorial decision on how best to provide the
public information about candidates for office," he said.
"All press organizations should be concerned when the
government asserts regulatory authority to punish and censor
news coverage." At issue was the Aug. 6, 2015 Fox
presidential debate. Initially, the network planned to host
one debate featuring 10 candidates. But as the date got
close and the nearly two dozen GOP presidential candidates
were close in the polls, Fox added a second debate that
included seven other candidates...
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com
PayPal for President? Obama's Campaign Gurus Join the
Payments Team
AUG 19, 2015 2:44pm ET - Harper Reed
and Dylan Richard first burst onto Chicago's tech scene as
part of Barack Obama's 2012 reelection team, and their
social media wizardry is often credited for keeping the
president in the White House...
http://www.paymentssource.com
Google accused of manipulating searches, burying
negative stories about Hillary Clinton
The Washington Times - Thursday, June 9,
2016 - An explosive report released Thursday suggests that
Google manipulated its search engine to boost Democratic
presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton by burying unflattering
stories about her. A video posted by SourceFed, a news and
pop-culture website, accused Google of attempting to boost
secretly Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy.
“Thanks to the help of our editor Spencer
Reed, SourceFed has discovered that Google has been actively
altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary
Clinton’s campaign so quietly that we were unable to see it
for what it was until today,” said SourceFed’s Matt
Lieberman in the video.
For example, when typing “Hillary Clinton
cri,” Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top
choice “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” even though competing
search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search
topics are “Hillary Clinton criminal charges” and “Hillary
Clinton crime.” While that could reflect legitimate
differences in the engines’ algorithms, Mr. Lieberman said
that a search of “Hillary Clinton crime reform” on Google
trends showed that “there weren’t even enough searches of
term to build a graph on the site.”
“Which begs the question, why on Earth is it
the first potential result?” he said, adding, “Apparently
far more people are searching for ‘Hillary Clinton crimes’
than ‘Hillary Clinton crime reform.’ Google just doesn’t
want you to know or ask.” SourceFed found a similar result
when typing in, “Hillary Clinton ind,” which yielded
“Hillary Clinton Indiana” and “Hillary Clinton India” on
Google, but “Hillary Clinton indictment” on the other search
engines.
“The intention is clear. Google is burying
potential searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary
Clinton in the primary elections over the past several
months by manipulating recommendations on their site,” Mr.
Lieberman said. There was no difference between Google and
other search engines when SourceFed searched for
unflattering terms associated with Democrat Bernie Sanders
and Republican Donald Trump...
http://www.washingtontimes.com
The stealthy, Eric Schmidt-backed startup that’s
working to put Hillary Clinton in the White House
October 09, 2015 - An under-the-radar
startup funded by billionaire Eric Schmidt has become a
major technology vendor for Hillary Clinton’s presidential
campaign, underscoring the bonds between Silicon Valley and
Democratic politics. The Groundwork, according to Democratic
campaign operatives and technologists, is part of efforts by
Schmidt—the executive chairman of Google parent-company
Alphabet—to ensure that Clinton has the engineering talent
needed to win the election. And it is one of a series of
quiet investments by Schmidt that recognize how modern
political campaigns are run, with data analytics and digital
outreach as vital ingredients that allow candidates to find,
court, and turn out critical voter blocs.
But campaigns—lacking stock options and
long-term job security—find it hard to attract the elite
engineering talent that Facebook, Google, and countless
startups rely on. That’s also part of the problem that
Schmidt and the Groundwork are helping Clinton’s team to
solve. The Groundwork is one of the Clinton campaign’s
biggest vendors, billing it for more than $177,000 in the
second quarter of 2015, according to federal filings. Yet
many political operatives know little about it. Its website
consists entirely of a grey-on-black triangle logo that
suggests “the digital roots of change” while also looking
vaguely like the Illuminati symbol:
“We’re not trying to obfuscate anything,
we’re just trying to keep our heads down and do stuff,” says
Michael Slaby, who runs the Groundwork. He was the chief
technology officer for president Barack Obama’s 2008
campaign, a top digital executive for Obama 2012, and the
former chief technology strategist for TomorrowVentures,
Schmidt’s angel investment fund.
http://qz.com
Brexit Leader Calls Obama’s Brexit Involvement
‘Disgraceful’
"How dare the American president..."
June 28, 2016 at 8:57am - A leader of the
effort to pull Britain out of the European Union continued
his attack on President Barack Obama Monday, saying Russian
President Vladimir Putin behaved in a more “statesmanlike”
manner than America’s president during the Brexit vote.
Nigel Farage, leader of the Independent Party, last week
said that Obama’s chiding in April of Britons to remain in
the EU was one factor that influenced their vote to leave.
Obama’s anti-Brexit remarks “backfired,” Farage said last week. “We got an Obama-Brexit bounce,
because people do not want foreign leaders telling them how
to think and vote. A lot of people in Britain said, ‘How
dare the American president come here and tell us what to
do?'”
“Vladimir Putin behaved in a more
statesmanlike manner than President Obama did in this
referendum campaign. Obama came to Britain, and I think,
behaved disgracefully, telling us we’d be at the back of the
queue … treating us, America’s strongest, oldest ally, in
this most extraordinary way,” he said. He noted later that
he is “not a fan” of Putin. However, he also said it took
two to make tensions flare over the Ukraine, and the EU did
more than its share.
In contrast do doom-and-gloomers, Farage
said Brexit offers new possibilities. “We are leaving a
failed political union and we are joining a bigger, better,
modern 21st century world,” he said. Farage further noted
that Americans trying to analyze Brexit do not fully
comprehend the circumstances that led Britons to approve it.
“We finished up, until last Thursday, with
70 percent of our laws being made by foreign institutions,
with our own supreme court being overruled in Luxembourg,
and with an open border 500 million people. Whatever
problems you’ve got in the USA, they are as nothing to what
we’ve had as part of this Europe,” he said.
http://www.westernjournalism.com
RELATED ARTICLES
Why Is The Obama Administration Contacting The Family And Friends Of
Journalists And Bloggers Harassing Them On His Behalf Over His Press
Clippings
New
Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring
Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims
Obama Criminally Targeting The Guardian Newspaper In London With
No Legal Mandate Or Jurisdictional Right
Obama’s War On Journalists Evident In The Case Of CBS News
Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Among Others
World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit