Attorney Rudy Giuliani States Robert Mueller Told Him He Cannot Indict President Donald Trump As It Goes Against Department Of Justice Rules And The U.S. Constitution

Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump

The people waiting for President Donald Trump to be hauled out of the White House in handcuffs don't hold your breath. The only way Trump is going to end up in cuffs in the White House is if his wife Melania decides to do something freaky. Special prosecutor, Robert S. Mueller, has gotten your hopes up regarding a case invented for political reasons that is currently falling apart.

One of the president's lawyers, former, famed New York city Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, publicly stated on the CNN network during an interview this week that Mueller privately informed him that he (Mueller) and his team, cannot indict Trump, as it is a violation of Department of Justice rules and the U.S. Constitution to do so to a sitting president.

Giuliani told the press, "They [the special counsel's office] acknowledge the fact that they can't indict us. They know they don't have that power. So their function is to write a report. We would like it to be the fairest report possible. But even if it isn't, we're prepared to rebut it in great detail, so we'd like them to do it. It's as clear as can be that they don't have the right to indict under the Justice Department rules. And I know they're not going to indict."

NBC News stated in an article on their website, "During the final months of the administration of former President Bill Clinton in 2000, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel said in a memo that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting president would be unconstitutional." 

Furthermore, as stated previously on the site, former FBI Director, James Comey, stated in Congress last year that President Trump is not the target of the Russia collusion case Mueller is pursuing. Last month, Comey also stated the same on the morning television show "The View." However, Mueller has deliberately misled the public for press attention and misused the case to target and harass the U.S. president, which is forbidden by law.

Recently, two federal judges slapped down Mueller's attempts at using the case against, Paul Manafort, the former campaign worker of failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and President Trump, to fish for information on the head of state, to pursue impeachment. Judge T.S. Ellis sternly told Mueller in court this month, "You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud. You really care about what information Mr. Manafort can give you to lead you to Mr. Trump and an impeachment or whatever."

Justice Department rules do not permit Mueller to use one case to broadly obtain information to start another indictment and one that is targeting a sitting President of the United States. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure also bar such misconduct by a prosecutor. Power hungry Mueller knows he is violating U.S. law in this regard and the judge issued him a humiliating reminder for doing so. Mueller truly believes he is above the law and can do whatever he pleases.

Manafort was indicted on allegations he colluded with America's rival Russia, which he and the Russian government deny. However, Manafort's behavior and bank accounts give the appearance he was being used by foreign entities to buy influence with Hillary Clinton, whom he worked with for years, then Trump, who fired him after 2-months. Manafort made trips to Russia, has ties to spies in the region and a massive bank account in the millions that he cannot properly explain. He also has lavish multi-million dollar homes and luxury items he cannot properly explain the source of the funding thereof. Even his wifi password has a spy theme to it. None of this looks innocent.  

Judge Amy Berman Jackson questioned the parameters of Mueller's case, which has turned into a fishing expedition targeting the president, more than the defendant Manafort. Once again, you have to stick to the indictment and point of the case. You cannot file a case about person 1, but spend the court's time repeatedly filing items in trying to get information about person 2, who is not even under indictment.

Mueller also deceitfully refused to show the court the letter the Justice Department's Rod Rosenstein issued him, regarding the parameters of the criminal case. Mueller presented a heavily redacted letter that told the court next to nothing, as is Mueller's standard, fraudulent behavior in legal and government matters. The man is completely dishonest and cannot be trusted. 

Then FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

When Mueller was the head of the FBI, he routinely and criminally flouted the Freedom of Information Act, in either not releasing government documents he was compelled to provide under the law or presenting heavily redacted items that revealed nothing of note, while hiding the agency's criminal behavior. I've broken many stories on the FBI and one of them was about Mueller illegally moving incriminating files out of the FBI's offices, so he could illegally deny they exist, criminally violating the Freedom of Information Act (The FBI's Secret File Room).

Congress failed in this regard, as many top publications and private citizens complained for years that Mueller routinely violated the Freedom of Information Act at the FBI, which is supposed to be about government transparency. I saw Mueller do so in the Anthony Pellicano criminal case I gave the FBI information on in 2005 (then, they made arrests 4-months after, but corruptly did not indict bribe issuing Hollywood stars who participated in the crimes).

Mueller refused to release the Freedom of Information Act files, in order to protect lawbreaking Hollywood figures, such as Harvey Weinstein (who has now fallen years later thanks to the New York Times and New Yorker magazine), in repeatedly lying in writing about the non-existence of files on the matter, then when pressed in a second letter, admitting in writing the files exist, but making up false, unlawful excuses why the items cannot be released (much like the FBI won't release the files on Martin Luther King Jr because the contents are that bad due to the fact the agency illegally terrorized and killed the late hero).

Mueller is a con artist, who has cost the taxpayers a fortune, and worst of all, many innocent lives (see 'RELATED ARTICLES' section below for further information on Mueller's criminal conduct). Mueller also criminally violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions in engaging in criminal acts of torture against innocent people he attached knowingly false labels to, in order to harm them for political and financial reasons, which ended up getting the FBI sued in a number of legal actions.

Mueller has not remained within the parameters provided by law and the Justice Department, in his frenzied pursuit of  President Trump. Mueller didn't come back to save America. He came back to save himself. Mueller committed a host of very serious, damaging crimes at the FBI that he is eligible for prosecution for under existing laws, especially now that he no longer heads up the agency.

Mueller came back to dig up dirt on Trump in a bid at controlling the president, a man who refuses to be controlled by others, for his own ends to stay out of prison. Mueller's family is also in trouble, as they benefited from money he improperly and illicitly gained while at the FBI. Mueller's conduct at the FBI also caused the deaths of many people in a scandal that is going to burst.

Mueller's unhinged, rogue behavior is going to end up taking down Rosenstein for having unleashed this madman on America a second time, after all his failures and the damage he inflicted on America and the world, while head of the FBI. Rosenstein is going to end up in the government's crosshairs because of Mueller's lawlessness.

If Trump did something illegal, of course he should be held accountable for it under the law, as should anyone. However, the Russia collusion case has no teeth where the president is concerned. Knowing this, Mueller has been breaking government laws and rules in attempting to fish for information through Manafort and the President's lawyer, Michael Cohen, and is using porn star, Stormy Daniels, in a bid at getting Trump impeached for adultery.

However, adultery is not a crime. It shouldn't have been a case against former President Bill Clinton and it should not be one against President Donald Trump. All these salacious details were released on television and the internet during the Clinton case, exposing American school children to graphic sexual content their minds were not able to properly process.

We did not need to know the graphic details of the former president's sex life regarding his mistress. Do not take the country down that road again. It was not a good time in American history. It was dark and depressing watching the head of state squirm under oath as all the tawdry, graphic details of his sex life in cheating on his wife, were distastefully placed on display.

STORY SOURCE

Mueller doesn't plan to indict Trump because of DOJ rules, Giuliani says

"They (the special counsel's office) acknowledge the fact that they can't indict us," Giuliani told NBC News on Wednesday.

May.16.2018 / 6:58 PM ET - WASHINGTON — Special counsel Robert Mueller has told President Donald Trump's legal team that he won't indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump's lawyers. "They [the special counsel's office] acknowledge the fact that they can't indict us," Giuliani told NBC News on Wednesday, indicating that the information had been conveyed to Trump's lawyers. "They know they don't have that power. So their function is to write a report. We would like it to be the fairest report possible. But even if it isn't, we're prepared to rebut it in great detail, so we'd like them to do it."

He added: "It's as clear as can be that they don't have the right to indict under the Justice Department rules. And I know they're not going to indict." During the final months of the administration of former President Bill Clinton in 2000, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel said in a memo that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting president would be unconstitutional."...

https://www.nbcnews.com

Giuliani says Mueller has informed him that Trump cannot be indicted

05/16/18 05:50 PM EDT - Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team told President Trump’s legal team that they can’t indict a sitting president, CNN reported Wednesday. Rudy Giuliani, who is leading Trump’s legal team in the Russia probe, told the network that when it comes to the president, Mueller’s team can only write a report at the conclusion of its investigation. Such a report could outline wrongdoing or include recommendations for the House.

“They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us,” Giuliani told CNN. The decision not to indict a sitting president would align with Justice Department guidelines dating back to the Nixon administration that say a sitting president can’t be indicted. Giuliani added that he believes the Constitution prevents the indictment of a sitting president. Mueller’s team declined to comment on the matter to CNN...

http://thehill.com/homenews

Judge raises doubts about scope of Mueller’s authority

Lawyers for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort get some traction, but it may not help their client.

04/19/2018 01:56 PM EDT - Updated 04/19/2018 02:39 PM EDT - A federal judge raised doubts Thursday about the scope of the order used to appoint special counsel Robert Mueller to probe alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

During a two-and-a-half hour hearing in one of Mueller’s criminal cases against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson questioned whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s directive appointing Mueller granted him more authority than Justice Department regulations appear to permit.

Manafort’s lead defense attorney, Kevin Downing, noted that the May 17 order appointing Mueller grants him authority to pursue the Trump-Russia probe as well as other issues that “may arise” from that investigation. Downing said that was at odds with Justice’s rules, which say a special counsel must be told of the “specific factual matter” in his or her mandate.

“That’s a fair point,” Jackson said, adding later: “I don’t think that, as good as he is, that the deputy attorney general can see into the future.” However, it’s far from clear whether whatever doubts Jackson may have about the appointment order will actually benefit Manafort in the criminal cases he currently faces: a five-count indictment in Washington on charges of money laundering and failing to register as a foreign agent for Ukraine and an 18-count indictment in Virginia on charges of bank fraud, tax evasion and failing to report foreign bank accounts.

Manafort’s lawyers have argued that Rosenstein’s May 17 order exceeded his authority under regulations adopted two decades ago to replace an expired and much-criticized independent counsel law. Manafort’s defense also contends that Mueller has gone further than Rosenstein authorized...

https://www.politico.com

RELATED ARTICLES

The Same Former FBI Director Robert Mueller Who Ignored Credible Tips From The Russian Government Warning Of The Boston Marathon Bombers Before They Killed Innocent People Is Now Claiming Donald Trump Colluded With The Russian Government But Has No Proof